Key moments in my production process especially came about during post-production when I realized what the limitations of my video would be as a result of my overall methods for creating the piece. First of all, I think that from now on I will forever shoot what seems to be an absurd amount of b-roll. If it seems like way too much while filming, it will probably be just right when it comes to actually putting the video together. Also, I know now that it will be beneficial to have more of a focus or purpose for the video, since that will give me direction when it comes to the filming.
Regarding feedback, I feel that much of the feedback, especially the criticisms, were well justified. I had received a comment regarding the pacing of my video, but that is something that had I filmed more b-roll footage, I would have had greater flexibility and control with. Also, I received a comment regarding the background music not quite fitting the video, which again I agreed with. One of my top reasons for including the music was again a result of having a shortage of b-roll and was an attempt to keep things interesting during the somewhat drawn-out interview segments. Lastly, I realized the risk I incurred by including my opening scene, although I was unsure after discussing it with the class what a better alternative would have been. On the other hand, I appreciated the positive remarks I had received regarding such things as the specific shots I included as well as the topics covered during the interview. It is interesting to me to receive a compliment about very specific aspects of a shot when that is something that I didn’t even originally articulate myself as to why it was a good shot, but rather something that I sought out and included instinctively. Regarding other students’ work, one thing that I noticed was a mixed review of the interview format, which ranged from the use of subtitles to display the questions, including the interviewer in the video, and excluding the interviewer altogether. It is clear that there is a multitude of factors at play that help dictate which method would be most effective, and it seems it is something that can really only be approached on a case-by-case basis. Since every video utilized a somewhat different style, some of the best overall advice that could be applied to anyone’s work is to make sure that the technical side of the video is well done, such as smooth transitions and good camera work. Without even considering the creative side of the video, this will ensure that distracting elements are kept to a minimum and the audience can focus on the intended message and purpose of the video.
One thing I learned about myself during this project is that I am often comfortable with ambiguity. Although I had a fairly detailed list of the shots I wanted to capture, there was still quite a bit of uncertainty and flexibility going into the filming. However, I do feel that it can be more effective if I spend additional time planning out the details and narrowing down the focus of a project. I also realized that I take an exceptionally long time while working on such a project since I have high expectations. In cases where the post-production dragged on for hours each day, I think taking breaks and revisiting notes for the purpose of the video would be in order.
I can see another audience for my video being anyone within the art community with an interest in Nick and his artwork. Nick may use my video in order to promote himself as an artist, even if it is only until he can afford to have a more professional one produced! I think that this will show others how dedicated Nick is to his craft and reflect positively on him with potential clients.
Somehow, this video took me five nights to film and produce. It was actually somewhat frustrating, but now that I have already tackled this project, I feel more prepared with insight and experience to tackle another project in the future.